Payment Practices Barometer UK 2016

Barómetro de Prácticas de Pago

  • United Kingdom
  • Agricultura,
  • Automoción/Transporte,
  • Productos químicos/Farmacéutica,
  • Construcción,
  • Bienes de consumo duraderos,
  • Electrónica / TIC,
  • Servicios financieros,
  • Alimento,
  • Máquinas/Ingeniería,
  • Metales,
  • Papel,
  • Servicios,
  • Acero,
  • Textiles

14 abr 2016

Survey findings point to Great Britain as the country in Western Europe that is the most impacted by late payment from export customers.

Key survey results

Sales on credit terms

Slightly above the 41.2% average for Western Europe, 44.3% of the total value of the business-to-business (B2B) sales of respondents in Great Britain was transacted on credit terms.

B2B sales on credit

This  does not differ from what was observed last year, and places Great Britain in the cluster of Western European countries (along with  Ireland, Spain, and Italy) with an average  value of B2B credit-based sales that is more or less in line with the average for Western Europe. This cluster falls in between two other groups of countries, which show a totally opposite approach to granting trade credit in B2B transactions. On one hand, there are  Austria, Switzerland, Belgium and France, whose respondents showed a very risk-averse approach to  granting trade credit. On the other hand, there is Greece, Sweden and Denmark, which appear to be the most inclined countries in Western Europe to offer credit terms in B2B transactions.

Fact box1 UK 2016

On average, British respondents seemed to be more likely to grant trade credit terms to domestic than to foreign B2B customers. 48.2% and 40.3% of the total value of domestic and foreign B2B sales respectively were on credit (survey averages: 44.8% domestic and 37.7% foreign). This suggests British respondents perceive the risk of payment default to be more likely to arise from credit-based sales to foreign than to domestic customers. This is the same perception of respondents in Southern Europe (Greece, Italy, Spain).

Overdue B2B invoices (%)

Around 90.0% of British respondents (88.0% in Western Europe) experienced late payment of invoices by B2B customers over the past year. This resulted in an average of 44.6% of the total value of B2B receivables remaining unpaid past the due date. This is above the 40.0% average for Western Europe, and is around 3% higher than last year. Much of this increase appears to stem from an upswing in  late foreign payments over the past year, which greatly outweighs that on the domestic market. This may explain why survey findings point to Great Britain as the country in Western Europe that is the most impacted by foreign late payment. This tallies with British respondents’ selective approach to granting trade credit  in B2B transactions.  

Past due B2B receivables

Late payment of invoices (domestic and foreign) is reflected in the Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) figure posted by British respondents. This averages 59 days (survey average: 48 days) and is over two weeks longer than last year. This may reflect a relatively poor performance in collection of high value outstanding invoices, particularly foreign invoices, than in most other Western European countries. One in four British respondents expect their DSO to worsen over the next 12 months.

In light of the above, it is not surprising that more respondents in Great Britain (22.3%) than in Western Europe (17.8%) are concerned about maintaining sufficient cash flow this year. Collection of  outstanding invoices in emerging markets and accurate assessment of customers’ payment default risk are also considered by British respondents to be challenges to business profitability in 2016.  

Payment duration (average days)

B2B trade credit payment terms extended by British respondents average 25 days from the invoice date (below the 31 days survey average) and do not vary between domestic and foreign customers. Compared to one year ago, payment terms granted to domestic B2B customers appear to be slightly shorter (by an average of 3 days). Foreign payment terms, in contrast, did not vary at all, suggesting that the perception of British respondents is that there was no improvement in payment default risk arising from B2B trade, particularly with foreign customers, over the past year.

Payment duration

Despite such a strict payment policy applied by British respondents, past due B2B invoices were settled by domestic and foreign customers within three weeks of the invoice due date. This is around one week longer than last year, and is consistent with the survey average.

As a consequence, respondents in Great Britain could turn overdue invoices into cash only, on average, 52 days after invoicing (survey average: 53 days). This may have an adverse impact on businesses cash flow position and tallies with the earlier mentioned findings. Reason why British respondents are concerned about maintaining sufficient cash flow this year.

Key payment delay factors

In line with the survey pattern, British respondents most often attributed late payment of  domestic B2B invoices to liquidity constraints of customers. This was cited by more respondents in Great Britain this year (49.4%, compared to nearly 58.0% in Western Europe) than last year (43.6%). In line with the survey pattern, British respondents are also of the opinion that  outstanding invoices are paid late by customers due to an intentional use of these for their financial advantage. 26.8% of respondents in Great Britain reported this (in line with 28.2% in Western Europe), down from 35.6% last year.

Fact box2 UK 2016

Contrary to the survey pattern, late payment from foreign customers was reported to occur most often due to inefficiencies of the banking system. Markedly more respondents in Great Britain (nearly 37.0%) than in Western Europe (23.1%) cited this, suggesting that this affects timeliness of foreign payments in Great Britain more than it does in most of the countries in Western Europe.

As a consequence of late payment of commercial invoices, notably more respondents in Great Britain (25.4%) than in Western Europe (18.3%) had to take specific measures to correct cash flow. This is again in line with respondents’ concern about cash flow. Nearly 24.0% of the British respondents (in line with the survey average) had to delay payments to their own suppliers.   

This may explain why more respondents in Great Britain (nearly 39.0%) than in Western Europe (33.7%) plan on checking their customers’ creditworthiness and payment history more often this year.

Uncollectable receivables

The proportion of B2B receivables reported by British respondents as uncollectable (1.4%) is in line with the 1.3% average for Western Europe.

Uncollectable B2B receivables

Domestic uncollectable receivables were written off almost as often as foreign ones. Uncollectable B2B receivables originate most often from the construction, financial and business services industries.

For more respondents in Great Britain (28.6%) than in Western Europe overall (19.7%), B2B receivables were uncollectable mainly because the customer could not be located. At the same time, more British respondents (31.1%) than in Western Europe overall (25.6%) reported that write-offs were mainly due to the high costs of pursuing the trade debtors, particularly on export markets.  

For more insights into the B2B receivables collections practices worldwide, please see the Global Collections Review by Atradius Collections (free download after registration), available from October 2016 on www.

Payment practices by industry

Survey respondents in Great Britain reported granting trade credit terms mainly to B2B customers in the consumer durables, construction, business services, financial services and overall services industries. Invoice payment terms extended to B2B customers in the financial services industry are significantly higher than the country average (averaging 30 days from invoicing). B2B customers in the construction industry are the slowest payers. On average, it takes them twice as long as customers in the other industries to settle past due bills.

Fact box3 UK 2016

The construction industry generated an above average (for the country) proportion of overdue invoices. According to most of the respondents  (around 60%) this is likely to be chiefly due to liquidity constraints of customers in this industry.

Around 30.0% of British respondents expect payment practices of B2B customers in the construction industry to deteriorate over the next 12 months. No significant change is anticipated in respect to payment practices of other industries.

Disclaimer y Buró de Entidades Financieras

Este informe se presenta, con fines de información únicamente y no está pensada como una recomendación en cuanto a las transacciones particulares, inversiones o estrategias en modo alguno a cualquier lector. Los lectores deben tomar sus propias decisiones independientes, comerciales o de cualquier otro tipo, con respecto a la información proporcionada. Aunque hemos hecho todo lo posible para garantizar que la información contenida en este informe sea obtenida de fuentes confiables, Atradius no es responsable por los errores u omisiones, o por los resultados obtenidos del uso de esta información. En ningún caso Atradius, sus corporaciones o empresas relacionadas, afiliadas y subsidiarias, ni los socios, agentes o empleados, serán responsables por cualquier decisión o medida adoptada con base en la información en este informe, o por ningún daño directo, indirecto, especial, incidental o consecuente, resultante del uso de la información de las declaraciones hechas en este documento. BURÓ DE ENTIDADES FINANCIERAS ¿Qué es el Buró de Entidades Financieras? Es una herramienta de consulta y difusión con la que podrás conocer los productos que ofrecen las entidades financieras, sus comisiones y tasas, las reclamaciones de los usuarios, las prácticas no sanas en que incurren, las sanciones administrativas que les han impuesto, las cláusulas abusivas de sus contratos y otra información que resulte relevante para informarte sobre su desempeño. Con el Buró de Entidades Financieras, se logrará saber quién es quién en bancos, seguros, sociedades financieras de objeto múltiple, cajas de ahorro, afores, entre otras entidades. Con ello, podrás comparar y evaluar a las entidades financieras, sus productos y servicios y tendrás mayores elementos para elegir lo que más te convenga. Esta información te será útil para elegir un producto financiero y también para conocer y usar mejor los que ya tienes. Este Buró de Entidades Financieras, es una herramienta que puede contribuir al crecimiento económico del país, al promover la competencia entre las instituciones financieras; que impulsará la transparencia al revelar información a los usuarios sobre el desempeño de éstas y los productos que ofrecen y que va a facilitar un manejo responsable de los productos y servicios financieros al conocer a detalle sus características. Lo anterior, podrá derivar en un mayor bienestar social, porque al conjuntar en un solo espacio tan diversa información del sistema financiero, el usuario tendrá más elementos para optimizar su presupuesto, para mejorar sus finanzas personales, para utilizar correctamente los créditos que fortalecerán su economía y obtener los seguros que la protejan, entre otros aspectos. Puedes consultar la información relativa al Buró de Entidades Financieras, tanto de Atradius Seguros de Crédito. S.A., como de todo el sector asegurador en el siguiente enlace: