Payment Practices Barometer Asia Pacific

Barómetro de Prácticas de Pago

  • Australia,
  • Japan,
  • Singapore,
  • Thailand
  • Agricultura

01 nov 2014

Concerns that credit quality could be deteriorating in several countries in Asia Pacific are growing.

Survey results for Asia Pacific

The macroeconomic outlook: risk of credit quality worsening in the region

Against the backdrop of a climbing global economy, emerging Asia – notably China, India, Indonesia and Taiwan - continues to show robust domestic demand coupled with an improving export profile, which should help sustain GDP growth of around 6.5% a year into 2015. Export, in particular, is likely to benefit from strengthening demand and competitive advantages. However, despite the global upswing, growth is likely to sit below pre-crisis rates and there is some caution about injecting excessive policy stimulus. All of these factors underscore the importance of advancing structural reforms.

While inflation has been low across much of the region, in certain economies it remains high – Indonesia and India in particular. Both nations also encountered external pressures last year at the hands of weaker capital flows, which led to monetary tightening. These corrections helped both currencies, although it is anticipated that monetary policy will remain tight in Indonesia for some time.

China holds large current account surpluses, which means it is less susceptible to external economic forces, however, the region overall is currently quite vulnerable to external volatility due to the large scale of foreign holdings, in Indonesia and India in particular. The former is still running a large current account deficit and would be most adversely affected, although India has undergone a sharp correction in its own current account deficit, reducing external vulnerabilities to an extent.

Across the region, the main risks arise from the potential worsening of the property sector in China, slowing inward investment if reforms are not implemented in India and Indonesia, and on-going delays in reducing fuel subsidies in Indonesia, which could trigger turbulence in financial markets.

Perhaps most importantly, however, there have been concerns regarding increasing debt and deteriorating credit quality in several countries – these are being addressed with various measures across several of the countries we surveyed.

The greatest challenge to business profitability this year

Respondents in Asia Pacific felt most pressurised by the stresses of “maintaining adequate cash flow”. Indeed, this was felt more strongly in this region than in either of the other regions surveyed, the Americas and Europe. In Asia Pacific, more than one in three respondents (35.6%) cited this as the main threat to business profitability, though it was felt particularly keenly in Taiwan (43.5% of respondents). This may be attributable to certain instabilities at the hands of the government purse – subsidies on commodities such as electricity, critical to the manufacturing process, have come to an end and rises seem set to continue, placing additional financial pressures on businesses.

The second biggest challenge was a “fall in demand for products and services”, which also rated higher than in the other two surveyed regions. At 32.3% for the region overall, respondents in Japan saw this as a particular threat, with 43.8% stating that this was their biggest challenge. With recent statistics showing the biggest Japanese economic contraction since the 2011 earthquake, this is unsurprising. The contraction has been attributed to the introduction of a consumer sales tax, which is set to rise again in April 2015 and could create further pressure for Japan’s businesses.

In third place, the “collection of outstanding invoices” is troubling just over 18% of respondents, although with Europe and Americas coming in at 21.8% and 22.5% respectively, this seems to be less of a concern to the Asia Pacific respondents than to others. Singapore however, came in at 26%, the highest result in the region. This may be due to the fact that, along with Hong Kong, Singapore has been the most active in granting trade credit to export customers, with over 43.6% of export transactions made on credit terms. Of note, almost half of Singapore respondents’ export invoices were unpaid at the due date.

In fourth and final place, 14.1% of respondents saw bank lending restrictions as an issue. India came in highest – likely the result of their current account deficit correction impacting the banking sector. Overall Asia Pacific and Europe gave this more or less equal rating with Americas coming in highest at 20% overall, suggesting that lending is still somewhat constrained in their region.

Past due receivables and uncollectables

On average, over a third (36.2%) of the total value of the invoices issued by respondents in Asia Pacific were reported to be unpaid when due. Across the region this was a problem particularly faced by businesses in Singapore, with 41.5% unpaid at their due date, which could prove a problem for an economy where over 40% of export transactions are made on credit terms. India was a close second at 40.4%. This suggests that India is proving a tricky trading environment, especially when coupled with the constrained bank lending highlighted previously in this report.

Outstanding invoices extending more than 90 days past due remains a problem for India and Singapore, with the highest scores of 6.1% and 5.7% respectively, and Australia not far behind at 5.6% - the highest in Asia Pacific. At the other end of the scale, however, Japan has no such problem, with just 1.5% of the total value of invoices remaining unpaid longer than 90 days past the due date. By region, Asia Pacific scores better, overall, at 4.4%, than either Europe at 4.6% or the Americas at 5.2%.

Uncollectable invoices are also a problem for businesses in India - of the total value of B2B sales on credit, 2.9% were deemed uncollectable. Singapore at 2.4% and Indonesia at 2.6% also have an above average amount of uncollectable debt. Across all three regions surveyed, Asia Pacific ranked second overall, with 2.2% of overdue debt uncollected behind the Americas at 2.7%.

By comparing the percentage of receivables that remained outstanding after 90 days past due to that of uncollectable receivables, we can conclude that on average, businesses in Asia Pacific lose 50% of the value of their receivables that are not paid within 90 days of the due date (average for Europe and the Americas: 35.0% and 51.9% respectively). By country, this percentage is highest in China, at 61% - of note, as Chinese respondents did not indicate above average levels of uncollectable debt - and lowest in Japan, at 20%.

Days Sales Outstanding - DSO

Businesses in Asia Pacific recorded an average of 54 Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) overall – on average, twenty days from the invoice due date to collection on credit sales. When compared with Americas and Europe, this represented a significantly higher figure.

When asked when DSO became a concern, on average, across the region, 71.5% of respondents reported they become concerned about the sustainability of their businesses when DSO exceeded average payment terms by 31 days. Scores ranked highest in China, where, at 78.9%, respondents seemed to be the least relaxed in this respect. The response from Chinese businesses is likely to be due to the relative infancy in the use of trade credit in thenation and thus their cautious approach to selling on credit.

Main reasons for late payment from B2B customers

Late domestic payments in Asia Pacific are most regularly attributable to insufficient funds (47.3% of respondents), with all except Japan citing this as the main reason. Indian businesses suffered most from this (54.8% of respondents), with Australia least impacted of all the countries surveyed (18.5%). Conversely, Japanese respondents were more likely than respondents in any other nation to suffer late payment due to incorrect information on the invoice.

Foreign invoices were more likely to go unpaid due to complexity of payment procedures. Chinese respondents felt this most strongly, with 55.9% stating this to be the case, although Indonesian, Indian and Taiwanese businesses all also rated this above 40% which suggests that the problem is fairly widespread.

Credit management policies used by respondents

Of all Asia Pacific respondents, 72.1% had some form of credit management system in place, though this was somewhat lower than the Americas, who came in at 81.5%. Of the Asia Pacific countries, India, at 85.4%, was most likely to use some form of credit management – possibly reflective of the changeable economic conditions, in particular, the slow down after several years of economic growth.

Policies put in place to manage credit were varied, but most popular were buyer creditworthiness checks, conducted by 51.93% of businesses, in line with the Americas survey respondents who came in at 50.23%. Credit monitoring was a close second, at 48.88%, also in line with the Americas result. Of note, however, is the feedback from Chinese participants, 58.43% of whom check buyer creditworthiness and 59.55% of whom monitor credit risk. This suggests that they are more actively protecting their credit than other countries surveyed; probably attributable to the relative newness of trading on credit and their cautious approach to doing so.

In terms of payment methods, the most popular in Asia Pacific are digital transfers of funds, cash, and cheque, in line with the Americas and Europe. Just over 20% of respondents felt cash use would increase, 41.9% foresee an increase in digital transfers of funds, whilst 19% anticipate an increase in the use of cheques. Comparatively speaking, businesses in the Americas responded similarly with 20.95% expecting an increase in the use of cash; 43.52% an increase in the use of digital transfers of funds but just 15.6% in the use of cheques. Credit cards and PayPal were also on the up – credit card use is anticipated to rise 41.5% by Asia Pacific businesses, whilst those in the Americas foresaw a rise of 44.2%. The use of PayPal is expected to surge according not only to 47.01% of those surveyed in Asia Pacific but also by 50.40% of those surveyed in Europe, and 57.59% of those in the Americas. These results are a clear reflection of the continuing increase, internationally, in online purchasing. 


Disclaimer y Buró de Entidades Financieras

Este informe se presenta, con fines de información únicamente y no está pensada como una recomendación en cuanto a las transacciones particulares, inversiones o estrategias en modo alguno a cualquier lector. Los lectores deben tomar sus propias decisiones independientes, comerciales o de cualquier otro tipo, con respecto a la información proporcionada. Aunque hemos hecho todo lo posible para garantizar que la información contenida en este informe sea obtenida de fuentes confiables, Atradius no es responsable por los errores u omisiones, o por los resultados obtenidos del uso de esta información. En ningún caso Atradius, sus corporaciones o empresas relacionadas, afiliadas y subsidiarias, ni los socios, agentes o empleados, serán responsables por cualquier decisión o medida adoptada con base en la información en este informe, o por ningún daño directo, indirecto, especial, incidental o consecuente, resultante del uso de la información de las declaraciones hechas en este documento. BURÓ DE ENTIDADES FINANCIERAS ¿Qué es el Buró de Entidades Financieras? Es una herramienta de consulta y difusión con la que podrás conocer los productos que ofrecen las entidades financieras, sus comisiones y tasas, las reclamaciones de los usuarios, las prácticas no sanas en que incurren, las sanciones administrativas que les han impuesto, las cláusulas abusivas de sus contratos y otra información que resulte relevante para informarte sobre su desempeño. Con el Buró de Entidades Financieras, se logrará saber quién es quién en bancos, seguros, sociedades financieras de objeto múltiple, cajas de ahorro, afores, entre otras entidades. Con ello, podrás comparar y evaluar a las entidades financieras, sus productos y servicios y tendrás mayores elementos para elegir lo que más te convenga. Esta información te será útil para elegir un producto financiero y también para conocer y usar mejor los que ya tienes. Este Buró de Entidades Financieras, es una herramienta que puede contribuir al crecimiento económico del país, al promover la competencia entre las instituciones financieras; que impulsará la transparencia al revelar información a los usuarios sobre el desempeño de éstas y los productos que ofrecen y que va a facilitar un manejo responsable de los productos y servicios financieros al conocer a detalle sus características. Lo anterior, podrá derivar en un mayor bienestar social, porque al conjuntar en un solo espacio tan diversa información del sistema financiero, el usuario tendrá más elementos para optimizar su presupuesto, para mejorar sus finanzas personales, para utilizar correctamente los créditos que fortalecerán su economía y obtener los seguros que la protejan, entre otros aspectos. Puedes consultar la información relativa al Buró de Entidades Financieras, tanto de Atradius Seguros de Crédito. S.A., como de todo el sector asegurador en el siguiente enlace: